Our Methodology
Our ratings and comparisons are based on objective criteria designed to help users evaluate software based on transparency, user control, and value - not subjective preferences.
Rating Criteria
Each alternative is rated on a 1-5 star scale based on the following weighted factors:
Transparency (30%)
How clear and accessible are the privacy policies, terms of service, and data practices? Do they clearly explain what data is collected and how it is used?
User Control (25%)
Can users easily export their data? Delete their accounts? Opt out of certain data collection? Control sharing settings?
Switching Ease (25%)
How difficult is it to migrate to or from this service? Are standard protocols and formats supported? Is data portability a priority?
Value (20%)
Does the service provide good value for its price point? Is there a functional free tier? Are paid features reasonably priced?
Data Collection
We gather information from the following sources:
- Official privacy policies and terms of service
- Company websites and documentation
- SEC filings and annual reports (for public companies)
- Independent security audits and certifications
- Reputable technology journalism and analysis
- Open source code repositories (where applicable)
Data Usage Categories
We categorize data usage into the following types:
Update Frequency
We review and update our data quarterly, or sooner when significant changes occur (such as acquisitions, policy updates, or major security incidents).
Corrections: If you believe any information is inaccurate or outdated, please contact us with documentation and we will review and update accordingly.